 |
 |
Extremely good video that explains the non-aggression principle with dizzying clarity. Well done again Molyneux:
Also credit to Think Twice who (I assume) did the editing. Their site has some other decent liberty videos.
Share
An excellent 4-parter from the prolific Mr. Molyneux. For those with a short attention span, video 3 is a quick wakeup call. I’m personally a big fan of the latter half of video 2. But if you have the time make sure to listen to the whole set as they are well worth listening to; [...]
I know Molyneux is a bit of a polarising figure amongst libertarians of various stripes but boy can he hold a crowd. The speech deals with a topic that is very important but not often talked about and that’s the Euphemisms the state uses and what it says about the people who are inventing these [...]
Very interesting speech from Stefan Molyneux that talks at length about the “against me” argument:
Share
N.B. I am not Davy
Brilliant but frightening analysis by Stefan Molyneux on the Greece/EU currency crisis:
And some Ron Paul thrown in for good measure:
Still think government is good? Argue your case on the forums!
— Jack Whitehead
Share
N.B. I am not Davy
This is quickly turning into a mirror of freedomainradio, but Stef wont stop making phenomenal videos! So here is the story of your enslavement as tax livestock:
— Jack Whitehead
Share
I’m just going to keep sharing Stefan Molyneux videos until he stops nailing issues:
Share
There is a problem of incentives when it comes to galvanising people to protest some infringement of their liberty. Usually the amount the special interest stands to gain is massively larger than the amount any one individual stands to lose. For instance, the farming union might stand to lose tens of millions of pounds in subsidies if [...]
N.B. I am not Davy
As always, the excellent Stefan Molyneux provokes a profoundly interesting question:
Has the government not achieved enough power and control yet to solve the problems it was supposed to solve? Why is there still a problem? I would also ask: if voting is needed to continually improve the government then why do we [...]
